|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
|
Quote:
with the whole front(adjustable) concave being an equal distance from the rotor and no real pinch point.. I'm sure there are a few other minor things that need to be figured too.
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 469
|
Csfarm,
Thanks for the heads up on the high wear part. I won't have to bother messing around with that piece. That's good because nobody was to interested in rolling a piece that thick for me. Did you update the front of your rotors? Northernfarmer, I will look into the St. Johns Rotor components. I was curious if any of you guys bale the wheat straw? I have a guy who puts small bales for a landscape company back east. I was wondering if the St. Johns cut would really break up the straw. I have learned how to adjust the machine to produce a walker like quality straw with my current set-up without grain losses. I will visit with him about the 9895 rotor. I appreciate your help with this matter. Does anyone hardsurface these components back into shape. I'm not sure if I will because I have quite a few major bar dings. I wondered if anyone had and how they got along with them. Masseypride |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
|
Masseypride:
If you can get the straw to be acceptable for small square bales with the original rotor, then you will have no problem with the St Johns rotor.. the one thing that the St Johns rotor allows you to do is run the rotor at a slower rpm and with a greater concave clearance.. so the straw doesn't breakup as bad, and there is less mog on the sieves.. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|