MF 205 combine needs new home - The Combine Forum
 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-18-2019, 08:39 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Carlinville, Illinois
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
MF 205 combine needs new home

Roughly 20 years back my family donated a well used MF 205 combine to the local historical society. They recently told me they had gotten a better/newer combine, and wanted to know if I'd like to have the 205 back.

I have no place to keep it and no use for it, so I told them "no". But I asked if it was O.K, if I looked for a new home for it rather than seeing it scrapped. They said that was fine.


Here's what I know:

The combine is in central Illinois - Roughly 75 minutes NE of St. Louis.

It has a 2 row 40" corn head and a 10' or 11' grain table that go with it.

They tell me that the combine runs, and they shelled corn with it in the fall of 2018. I have not driven it myself for several years.



I located one picture of it, which you should find attached. You'll notice that I added a non-stock muffler along the right side, as the thing was awfully noisy.



If another non-profit antique machinery club is interested in the thing I'm pretty sure they'd just give it to you. If a private collector want it I'll put you in touch with the people who can make a decision. But I'm certain it would be relatively inexpensive.


If a home isn't found for it I'm guessing they'll scrap it. But that decision is not up to me.



If you're interested, I'll try to check back in here over the next few weeks. Or you can email me:


rsitruss at yahoo dot com




Thanks.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg MF 205 at east end of field.jpg (164.8 KB, 26 views)
bosshog is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-19-2019, 07:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
That's kinda neat. Cant say I've ever seen one. Was it before the 510s or a smaller one? Guessing cabs where optional?

361turbo is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-19-2019, 07:58 PM
HI!
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Three Hills/Trochu, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,267
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 4637 Post(s)
Interesting the engine was behind the hopper, then they moved in front and right of cab, then behind hopper again.
Don Boles is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 12:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
The 205 was built the same time as the 510 (45 in. cyl.) 410 (37 in. cyl.) and 300 (32 in. cyl.) it was the smallest of the series, if I remember right, it had a a 27 in. cylinder.
SK Farmer is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 08:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Boles View Post
Interesting the engine was behind the hopper, then they moved in front and right of cab, then behind hopper again.
Thought that was neat as well. Who ever decided that needed to be right next to the driver needs to be kicked in the sack! I remember my dad had a 8820 and the a/c was cold but if it was tshirt weather it never froze you out. The first year I ran it it blew a freon line. 2 days out for a new one. What a miserable sob! Never got cold during the late season tho.
361turbo is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 08:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SK Farmer View Post
The 205 was built the same time as the 510 (45 in. cyl.) 410 (37 in. cyl.) and 300 (32 in. cyl.) it was the smallest of the series, if I remember right, it had a a 27 in. cylinder.
What engine was in the 205?
361turbo is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 09:31 AM
jvw
Senior Member
 
jvw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
I wonder why they couldn't keep their numbering system consistent. 405 was a pulltype version of the 410, so one could assume 205 would be a pull type as well, but no.

Justin Trudeau, accomplishing miracles since 2015, making Pierre Elliot look smart, competent and western friendly.
jvw is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 10:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 361turbo View Post
Thought that was neat as well. Who ever decided that needed to be right next to the driver needs to be kicked in the sack! I remember my dad had a 8820 and the a/c was cold but if it was tshirt weather it never froze you out. The first year I ran it it blew a freon line. 2 days out for a new one. What a miserable sob! Never got cold during the late season tho.
The reason the engine was by the cab was to keep the center of mass of the combine lower. With the engine at the back it raises the height the engine sits about 2 feet. The other thing prior to all your warning lights and buzzers it was easier to see if an oil line or filter ruptured and if something was going wrong you could hear it. You gotta remember this was a design prior to cabs and hauling these machines for custom cutters was on the back of a grain truck. By the mid 70's would've been the time to change this, but these companies MF, JD, and White had heavily invested in this design. We were down at a customer appreciation event with MF in 1983 and they were questioning us if engine should be kept where it was or moved back behind hopper the majority of us picked keep it the same.
SK Farmer is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 10:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 361turbo View Post
What engine was in the 205?
When I find my literature on these I'll tell you for sure, but from memory it came standard with a slant 6 Chrysler about 50 hp.. These combines were built from 1966 to 1970 and about 1751 units were built. They had replaced the MF 35 built from 1958 to 1964.
SK Farmer is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-20-2019, 12:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Found the info. the engine used was a Chrysler 170 cu.in. 6 cyl. The 300 used a Chrysler 225 cu.in. 6 cyl. and a optional Perkins 203 cu.in. 4cyl. The 410 used a GM 292 cu.in. 6 cyl. and optional Perkins 300 cu.in. 4 cyl. The 510 used GM 327 cu.in V8 and optional Perkins 354 cu.in. 6 cyl.

SK Farmer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The Combine Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John Deere 7720 vs 9600 vs 9560 STS Combine Choice for African Farmer Passionatefarmer John Deere 8 11-22-2018 06:02 PM
TA78 New Holland Combine Conversation! BRPFan New Holland 1 04-19-2018 12:10 AM
Combine Progression History abarsn180 John Deere 5 01-17-2013 08:36 PM
looking to buy 1st combine, opinions? robmgrig John Deere 32 03-06-2011 11:23 PM
Pictures-Hauled Home A S MM Combine Sat super27 Antique Machinery 3 06-12-2007 06:48 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome