This is getting interesting to catch up on
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: a61e11 No.5594813 📁
Mar 9 2019 18
Nellie Ohr > C_A?
There are others within the FBI/DOJ linked to the C_A.
What access does a House member have?
What access does a House Committee member have?
Think [Brennan] spy campaign > US SENATE
What happens when the C_A targets [spy insertion] the Executive, House, Senate, DOJ, FBI, State, etc branches of the UNITED STATES GOV?
How many so-called 'former' C_A agents ran for House elections in 2018?
What happens when the C_A targets [spy + tech insertion] of GOOG, FB [LifeLog], Twitter, etc etc?
What happens when people wake up to the fact that FB is a cover for LifeLog [DARPA]?
What happens when people discover all RT data [inputs + listening/camera/GPS meta] is being harvested and made accessible to Langley?
Charter of the NSA? DOMESTIC + FOREIGN?
Charter of the C_A? FOREIGN (NOT DOMESTIC (FORBID LAW))
Why is the C_A conducting an active umbrella collection campaign [stringer tangents to 9] against all US citizens through LifeLog [FB] absorb/tan targeting?
Bypass data encryption on phone/tablet etc?
Primary focus on elected officials?
Primary focus on elected officials in key sub committees?
Can activation occur of 'recording' local on device pre SCIF entry?
Ghost in-Ghost out.
People only engage security (+ escape vehicles) when they have something very serious to FEAR.
What is that FEAR for MZ?
Bruce Ohr testified that he and his wife shared the same email address for their work. Which is odd because Bruce works for the government in a high level and his wife doesn't. But that's not important right now.
What is interesting is what exactly the CIA is up to when protecting "national security". Anyone starting to think part of what is being protected is not your well being as a citizen but other things, such as systems brought into place in 1913. And many others.
What is the point of monitoring everyone. Or is that just conspiracy talk, even though there has been many articles in the "news" stating exactly that your data is mined, recorded, transferred. Suppose it is important to know how people, as a whole, respond to various stimuli so that different actions can be taken to steer the mind set in a different direction.
It would be crazy stuff to beleive such monitoring existed. If it did, those on board with protecting "national security" are easy to track and those not on board are easy to identify and influence/pressure/remove.