Lee, I have been hearing the 970 does about 30 to 40 per cent more than a cx 860. I guess it boils down to how many acres one can do with the least amount of money going out. I have one neighbor that was doing 4000 acres each year with one 860 in about 3 weeks. He traded to a 970 and was doing 240 acres of barley a day using a 36 foot header. For 2006, the 970 is getting a base of 420 hp with boost as well, also increased clean grain flow drives, hydraulic fan drive and different configuration with the shoe. As well as the extra 50 hp the engine does with a higher rpm peak so this should increase capacity a fair amount. In europe I would be interested in what the cr 980 does. in regards to capacity of the cx 840/860 I think there are limits to what a conventional combine can do without throwing over the walkers. The wider draper headers are not feeding the conventional combines evenly so throwing over issues are not good. I found with the 970, I could keep the rotors full with 30 foot draper header, but we had thick straw. I would think you have more grain per unit of straw than we do. I also found I ran out of power before it threw over grain such as wheat, canola, peas and oats so I think it could use the extra power. Our wheat was running about 1.5 tonne per acre with some areas up to 2 tonnes. Most of our harvest was in damp conditions his year. I would be interested in how you do in fuel per bushels done per hour. One example I heard of yesterday was comparing 2 9860s deeres using over 19 gallons of fuel per hour each while working the same acres per hour as a cr 970 but it was using only 14 gallons per hour. In our conditions we were doing 22 acres per hour. With such high yielding crops as yours, one would use a lot of fuel per acre but per grain harvested, how do you do? Our wheat is 36.744 bushels per 1 tonne. Barley is 45.93 bu/tonne.