We're new Deere combine owners, currently own twos680s and two 8230s, we're harvesting at least a mile an hour faster with less loss with the deere's than with the cases,Always demo before buying.... I know a few new Deere owners that wished they did...
I don't believe youWe're new Deere combine owners, currently own twos680s and two 8230s, we're harvesting at least a mile an hour faster with less loss with the deere's than with the cases,
Care to explain why you don't believe me?I don't believe you
Are you running power limit with those machines all the time? How about fuel consumption per acre, how does that compare?We're new Deere combine owners, currently own twos680s and two 8230s, we're harvesting at least a mile an hour faster with less loss with the deere's than with the cases,
with a screen name like that, of course you areWe're new Deere combine owners, currently own twos680s and two 8230s, we're harvesting at least a mile an hour faster with less loss with the deere's than with the cases,
It was straight cutting barley with green straw the S680s just handled it better and the rotors on the 8120s plug way to easy and I have always thought that, fuel consumption was the same 1.4 gal ac, I was surprised with the outcome as well, but I think the Deere's do have a little more hp.Are you running power limit with those machines all the time? How about fuel consumption per acre, how does that compare?
As to the original poster's question: Both of those machines will do a similar job from what I have seen so if starting from scratch I would go with the dealer that you feel will give the best support.
Educate yourself...NH uses rethrashers and dumps in the cleaning area. It has been that way since CR took over TR. And since case used NH frame and concept for their combine they also have it. Actually the shoe on the CR and case came from the TX.I'd buy a NH just because it has a real return and can rethrash in the rotor, not some dumb spinning paddles throwing it on the sieve!!!!! Seriously, that one distinction has caused a lot of people to choose yellow over red.
Running 8120 beside S680 this year first Deere on our farm for more than 15 years. I am a big fan of the Case, but we have been frustrated with the cleaning capacity on our Case especially in small seed crops like Canola, Flax and Canary. We measured losses in our first Canola field 40 foot swath running around 50BPA spent half a day weighing losses. Could not get 8120 over 3.5 MPH without starting to see significant losses. 680 at 5MPH less than 1% losses. All other crops I thought they would be comparable but the 680 has performed well. I expect the 8230 would be more apples to apples in Cereals. The Case needs a longer cleaning area, end of story.... If the ever put one in I would probably go back.Just because of your name, and its not that I don't believe that the deere went faster, its that 1 MPH is a HUGE gap. Got a perdickty buddy that ran a Case last year and is running a Deere s680 this year, ill be interested in his results. Harvest is barely at 1% in the NE right now, ill know more in three weeks
What settings are you running in the Deere's in canola??Running 8120 beside S680 this year first Deere on our farm for more than 15 years. I am a big fan of the Case, but we have been frustrated with the cleaning capacity on our Case especially in small seed crops like Canola, Flax and Canary. We measured losses in our first Canola field 40 foot swath running around 50BPA spent half a day weighing losses. Could not get 8120 over 3.5 MPH without starting to see significant losses. 680 at 5MPH less than 1% losses. All other crops I thought they would be comparable but the 680 has performed well. I expect the 8230 would be more apples to apples in Cereals. The Case needs a longer cleaning area, end of story.... If the ever put one in I would probably go back.
This seems so odd to me, because we have really nice capacity in cereals and canola with our 9070. Not going to go out there and say that we are smoking any deeres or anything but information from friend to friend with deeres it all seems very comparable. When our combine has the same sieve as a case, why is case having problems with throw over? I do understand that the twin rotors lay a nice even spread on the pan but how could it be that drastically better than case?Running 8120 beside S680 this year first Deere on our farm for more than 15 years. I am a big fan of the Case, but we have been frustrated with the cleaning capacity on our Case especially in small seed crops like Canola, Flax and Canary. We measured losses in our first Canola field 40 foot swath running around 50BPA spent half a day weighing losses. Could not get 8120 over 3.5 MPH without starting to see significant losses. 680 at 5MPH less than 1% losses. All other crops I thought they would be comparable but the 680 has performed well. I expect the 8230 would be more apples to apples in Cereals. The Case needs a longer cleaning area, end of story.... If the ever put one in I would probably go back.