One other thing to consider is you are limited to certain brands with either drive system, which could be a factor depending on what options you may want,hydro usually requires more fuel than mech. drive also.
then there are the gears in the mech drive, so to change speed, you need to shift or use throttle (no big deal in my mind, but with the hydro, the engine is always up and you just push/pull the hydro so it is easier)
Well....kind of the same, but because of the decrease in engine rpm, the pump slows down also...sometimes that will make the rate controller not work so hard???? in summary.... Hydro unit ground speed increase, engine same rpm, rate controller increase flow. for mech drive, engine rpm increase as ground speed increase....what does rate controller do? depends on rate and speed, it might need to decrease flow???? cool huh!They are Allison automatic transmission on some that I know off. The way a controller recovers would be the same on hydro and mechanical wouldn't it?
Not exactly true my new holland 275r has front wheel assist and I doubt any hydro will turn tighter unless they have 4 wheel steer. Biggest advantage was it was about 100 grand cheaper that deere or case.Pros for direct drive.
Simple.
Efficient.
Reliable.
Cons
Weight
Limited to 2wd and 2 wheel steering
Suspension limitations
Pros for hydro
Adaptable to tight steering
More suspension possibilities
Does not hinder ground clearance
Ease of use, responsive
Cons
Expensive initial costs and can be expensive to maintain
well, they aren't expensive to maintain, just change oil....but when they stop working is when the costs come in.When people say hydros are expensive to maintain what is it that requires the maintenance?? Is it the wheel motors. At what age do they need major overhaul?