Joined
·
1,646 Posts
I've been checking the results of my first year with an air drill, Concord with Dutch precision paired row and no harrows or closers. In no-till, the results are positive, very even emergence and depth, but in tilled ground, the depth is very variable. These openers move a lot of dirt, regardless of speed, the walking beam packers don't equalize the seedbed the way gang packers do. End result being, the front rank being buried in places, the back rank and anything behind a wheel leaving seed uncovered. Almost never short of moisture here, so I try to seed as shallow as possible, even leaving some Canola above ground, as it generally germinates.
Most every other Concord I've seen has either had harrows or pheonix rotary harrows mounted, and I can see why. I prefer to keep the seed in the bottom of a trench than level the ground out completely, seems to be less crusting in our clay, faster emergence wet or dry, and less weed competition. Would 2 bar harrows completely level the ground ahead of the packers eliminating the trench? Are they aggresive enough to uncover the front rank? What is the idea behind the individual tines mounted to each shank, as opposed to mounted harrows? I've never seen a Phoenix in action, do they move a lot of dirt, and would they mess up the rows in shallow Canola? Do they give any grief in trash or mud, or cause compaction?
I also had a lot of grief setting the depth. The geometry of the phasing cylinders is not quite correct( I worked out the volumes, it CANNOT lift level), it was adjusted level at the top, but as it goes down, both sets of wings go up relative to center. The cylinders are not creeping or leaking, they rephase at the top as they are supposed to. So after much work, I got the machine level at working depth, but when I change depth significantly, it is no longer level. Since I am performing both till and no till, in a wide range of soil types, often in the same field, all requiring different depths, that is a nuisance.
In no till, the wheel tracks are insignificant, but in worked ground I need to be able to set a few shanks much deeper. Plus there is much more weight on the inner and middle castors than on the outers , in soft soil, the outer wings ride much higher as a result. Shimming would be a big job on a regular basis, adjusting the threads on each cylinder whenever conditions change is no fun. With the phasing cylinders, I can't easily just set the center section deeper to reach the wheel tracks. I'm considering plumbing the cylinders in parallel so that I can use the depth stops to set each section independently, could even tip the front up to keep the front rank from being so deep. Has anyone tried that, will the machine still lift relatively even or will it lift in stages? Could even get complicated and add a bunch of manual valves and hoses to switch between series and parallel depending on the conditions.
This may not be such an issue on a normal year( whatever that is), this year the seedbed was never more than 1/4" down to pure mud, and the tires were often built up with mud affecting depth as well.
Would converting the drill to 4 rank help much? Only 1/4 instead of 1/3 of the runs would be at risk of being buried, it would move some runs closer to the packer wheels, should help keep them more consistent depth compared to being in the middle, and would move some weight to the press wheels and off the casters. Can you still mount harrows with 4 ranks? It plugged very rarely with 3 ranks, so that is not a motivation.
I expect the best answer is go and buy a parallel link drill and eliminate all of these problems, but that's not quite in the budget.
Most every other Concord I've seen has either had harrows or pheonix rotary harrows mounted, and I can see why. I prefer to keep the seed in the bottom of a trench than level the ground out completely, seems to be less crusting in our clay, faster emergence wet or dry, and less weed competition. Would 2 bar harrows completely level the ground ahead of the packers eliminating the trench? Are they aggresive enough to uncover the front rank? What is the idea behind the individual tines mounted to each shank, as opposed to mounted harrows? I've never seen a Phoenix in action, do they move a lot of dirt, and would they mess up the rows in shallow Canola? Do they give any grief in trash or mud, or cause compaction?
I also had a lot of grief setting the depth. The geometry of the phasing cylinders is not quite correct( I worked out the volumes, it CANNOT lift level), it was adjusted level at the top, but as it goes down, both sets of wings go up relative to center. The cylinders are not creeping or leaking, they rephase at the top as they are supposed to. So after much work, I got the machine level at working depth, but when I change depth significantly, it is no longer level. Since I am performing both till and no till, in a wide range of soil types, often in the same field, all requiring different depths, that is a nuisance.
In no till, the wheel tracks are insignificant, but in worked ground I need to be able to set a few shanks much deeper. Plus there is much more weight on the inner and middle castors than on the outers , in soft soil, the outer wings ride much higher as a result. Shimming would be a big job on a regular basis, adjusting the threads on each cylinder whenever conditions change is no fun. With the phasing cylinders, I can't easily just set the center section deeper to reach the wheel tracks. I'm considering plumbing the cylinders in parallel so that I can use the depth stops to set each section independently, could even tip the front up to keep the front rank from being so deep. Has anyone tried that, will the machine still lift relatively even or will it lift in stages? Could even get complicated and add a bunch of manual valves and hoses to switch between series and parallel depending on the conditions.
This may not be such an issue on a normal year( whatever that is), this year the seedbed was never more than 1/4" down to pure mud, and the tires were often built up with mud affecting depth as well.
Would converting the drill to 4 rank help much? Only 1/4 instead of 1/3 of the runs would be at risk of being buried, it would move some runs closer to the packer wheels, should help keep them more consistent depth compared to being in the middle, and would move some weight to the press wheels and off the casters. Can you still mount harrows with 4 ranks? It plugged very rarely with 3 ranks, so that is not a motivation.
I expect the best answer is go and buy a parallel link drill and eliminate all of these problems, but that's not quite in the budget.