Joined
·
93 Posts
Check out our OP Canola experiment we did in 2014
http://jagfarms.blogspot.ca/2014/10/2014-canola-experiment.html?m=1
http://jagfarms.blogspot.ca/2014/10/2014-canola-experiment.html?m=1
So are you going to next year?We never did a side by side trial as I did not think the OP variety would even come close.
With Very similar land types and agronomy the OP variety yielded almost the same and even a bit better on large fields about 2 miles apart.
We are located in South West Saskatchewan.
That's unfortunate. To do anything but side by side has little statistical value.I will leave the side by side trials to some one else to try.
.
I'm tryin to cypher this....IHARF did a side by side yield data map by strips up and down the field....every strip of side by side had yield spreads in wheat...each 30 foot pass had side by side yields of - 46-49-49-52-49-46-53-53-55-62 bu/ac on 10 passes...BUT "No treatments were Applied"...this great slide or info was titled, "Why Statistical Evaluation"....and sub titled "naturally occurring variability - what is the probability that observed differences are due to chance?".....Folks, I pinned this on my office bulletin board....a simple reminder that farmer side by side observation is of interest but that is it! Take that to replicated data and over 3 years, then come back to the masses with your new statistically significant data....That's unfortunate. To do anything but side by side has little statistical value.
And just which organization would you recommend?Or spend $2000 per year and get a farmer directed research organization to do a replicated small plot trial.
You have a choice, either replicate it 400 times to get a built in check or you run a check between each strip if you only have one. Perfect, no but gives you a pretty good idea.I'm tryin to cypher this....IHARF did a side by side yield data map by strips up and down the field....every strip of side by side had yield spreads in wheat...each 30 foot pass had side by side yields of - 46-49-49-52-49-46-53-53-55-62 bu/ac on 10 passes...BUT "No treatments were Applied"...this great slide or info was titled, "Why Statistical Evaluation"....and sub titled "naturally occurring variability - what is the probability that observed differences are due to chance?".....Folks, I pinned this on my office bulletin board....a simple reminder that farmer side by side observation is of interest but that is it! Take that to replicated data and over 3 years, then come back to the masses with your new statistically significant data....
Canola is a funny crop. Seems Mother Nature has more to do with yield than anything. Although these newer hybrids respond better to groceries, handle stress better, and yield more consistently. The older op stuff of the day had the potential to yield big but I think the conditions influenced the outcomes more than anything. I would like to see some proper field scale trials between the likes of 46a76, westar, Midas, and some of the new ones. Use the best weed control for each type and use a medium fertility package. None of this 200lb an acre nitrogen test plot bs. Real world conditions. A guy who did a fair amount of plot work for a certain company told me the plots are manipulated with multiple fung apps and huge amounts of fertilizer. Kinda like putting a bull on test. Sure he might perform fantastic on full feed but he could still be no **** good cause he isn't sound enough to breed.A few years back I had a field of flax after canola and totally botched the seed rate fertilizer and burned most of the flax. Just happened that there was a pretty awesome volunteer canola crop coming that was just thick enough to make a nice stand. So I sprayed the flax out! Did a solid 40 and there's no question it could have been better if it was seeded as there was spots to thin and to thick. LOL so screw statistics....and no I did not report it and yes I will deny it.
Canola is a funny crop. Seems Mother Nature has more to do with yield than anything. Although these newer hybrids respond better to groceries, handle stress better, and yield more consistently. The older op stuff of the day had the potential to yield big but I think the conditions influenced the outcomes more than anything. I would like to see some proper field scale trials between the likes of 46a76, westar, Midas, and some of the new ones. Use the best weed control for each type and use a medium fertility package. None of this 200lb an acre nitrogen test plot bs. Real world conditions. A guy who did a fair amount of plot work for a certain company told me the plots are manipulated with multiple fung apps and huge amounts of fertilizer. Kinda like putting a bull on test. Sure he might perform fantastic on full feed but he could still be no **** good cause he isn't sound enough to breed.