Joined
·
117 Posts
I heard an interesting thought about putting a shelbourne stripper header on a 9600 and wanted to get you all's thoughts on the subject.
The Theory:
On a 9600 with a stripper header you don't really need the straw walkers so if you run a stripper header on a 9600 you should be able to slow the walkers way down or even turn them off. This would be while cutting wheat of coarse. Is there any truth to this at all.
If this theory were true this would make a shelbourne header very appealing for a 9600 due to a lot of the maintenance coming from the walkers. so if they could be turned down to run slower or even disabled and not ran at all, that would cut about half of the maintenance or problem areas away from the combine. This could make the 9600 on of the better combines to run with a stripper header.
any thoughts on this would be awesome. I will be cutting at least one more wheat crop with my current 930 header but hopefully after that will be looking to change to either a draper or maybe a stripper header if this theory is at all correct.
Thanks, Cody
The Theory:
On a 9600 with a stripper header you don't really need the straw walkers so if you run a stripper header on a 9600 you should be able to slow the walkers way down or even turn them off. This would be while cutting wheat of coarse. Is there any truth to this at all.
If this theory were true this would make a shelbourne header very appealing for a 9600 due to a lot of the maintenance coming from the walkers. so if they could be turned down to run slower or even disabled and not ran at all, that would cut about half of the maintenance or problem areas away from the combine. This could make the 9600 on of the better combines to run with a stripper header.
any thoughts on this would be awesome. I will be cutting at least one more wheat crop with my current 930 header but hopefully after that will be looking to change to either a draper or maybe a stripper header if this theory is at all correct.
Thanks, Cody