Finally making some visible progress on my L2 refurb.
The friend who is helping me is a diehard Case guy. We were just shooting the breeze while we worked and he commented that the size (length) of the separator raddle (the one behind the feederhouse) doesn't make sense to him. If 80% of the threshing is done at the cylinder/concave in the feederhouse why do you need so much raddle length behind it. For that matter why send the threshed product up the feederhouse raddle and then dump it on the 5 ft + sep raddle. He says that is way inefficient.
Me being a Gleaner fan didn't have a satisfactory reason other than the design had been around for a long time, it worked as well or better than other systems and the Gleaner engineers aren't stupid.
Can anyone shed any more thoughts on why the above exists and is it as good and efficient as I'd like to believe.
The friend who is helping me is a diehard Case guy. We were just shooting the breeze while we worked and he commented that the size (length) of the separator raddle (the one behind the feederhouse) doesn't make sense to him. If 80% of the threshing is done at the cylinder/concave in the feederhouse why do you need so much raddle length behind it. For that matter why send the threshed product up the feederhouse raddle and then dump it on the 5 ft + sep raddle. He says that is way inefficient.
Me being a Gleaner fan didn't have a satisfactory reason other than the design had been around for a long time, it worked as well or better than other systems and the Gleaner engineers aren't stupid.
Can anyone shed any more thoughts on why the above exists and is it as good and efficient as I'd like to believe.