The Combine Forum banner

John Deere 48 Row Planter

31K views 124 replies 49 participants last post by  factoryfarmer  
#1 ·




 
#6 ·
I'm more of a Monosem man myself but that sure does look impressive. Looks quite expensive, with seed sensors and other monitors, CCS, somewhat of a liquid injection system & the Central Insecticide System. But like cessnaguy said, why bother with the little stuff if your fields are large and can justify this setup-increase in productivity.

These planters will save labour, fuel, time and overall money but would hate the days when you have to replace disc openers, changing seed plates, replace disc opener scrapers will take some time but that all in the name of farming.
 
#7 ·
Good gravy. That would certainly get a lot done in a hurry, but with four oil wells per quarter becoming the norm it would probably be more hassle than it's worth in our fields. Plus, I can imagine myself getting out of the tractor and walking half-way around the machine then thinking, "wait, which row failed?"
 
#8 ·
That already exists, but if I had that planter the first thing I'd do is number the back of each row unit so I can find the one that's giving trouble at a glance. It's bad enough on my planter when I spend a minute trying to figure out why Row 10 isn't planting, then realize I stumbled into Row 9 by mistake.
Image
 
#13 ·
Wow! That's incredible.
Image

And on that folding winglet bar there's room for at least 4 more rows per wing.

It'll be interesting to see the mechanical marker system they put on this planter... if they decide to offer it but it may be offered as auto-steer only.

I see a problem with ground clearance during transport though. That's a long span to be carrying that low to the ground.That hitch mechanism had better be capable of lifting the front of that planter high into the air to prevent "high centering" of the row units.Or maybe they can hydraulically "arch" the bars upward for ground clearance.Otherwise they'll go CRUNCH! when they scrape the ground.
Flexible enough? The 36-30"'s look like they are so this one should be too.
Practical? well... probably not.
Saleable? Yep. There's always that crowd who gotta have the biggest,baddest, raddest,bad a$$ed machinery around.All it takes is monnnneyyyy.
Image
 
#15 ·
Just an idea here and it might have some merit.
In the trailed configuration for the road, it would help if the rear wheels on the planter had some steering capabitity to follow around a ticht corner.

When planting, if a row decides to skip because of some problem, each feedtube could have a photo electric sensor that would display a warning and location of the problem in the tractor cab.
 
#17 ·
That already exists, but if I had that planter the first thing I'd do is number the back of each row unit so I can find the one that's giving trouble at a glance. It's bad enough on my planter when I spend a minute trying to figure out why Row 10 isn't planting, then realize I stumbled into Row 9 by mistake.
Image


All of our planter that we have had or still have are numbered, like you said it makes it alot easier
Image
Except we had to re-number the 24 row when we found out that the monitor told us 12 right and 12 left rather than 1-24
Image


-Dave
 
#19 ·
Well, a lot of the land is pretty much worthless in these parts and it takes a section to get anything out of it. Plus, our good irrigated land isn't selling for $3-4K/acre like back east.

There are some sections watered by half-milers where a planter that big could be efficient, but most of them have too many obstructions scattered throughout. A farmer would also have to have a smaller planter to handle dryland corners and whatnot.