Canola
Wheat
Edited to include both tests
Wheat
Edited to include both tests
there’s going to be harvest. Just might be a 9600 keeps up with a X9.Think there will be a harvest?
No Fendt 10?combines that are going to the test
Claas Lexion 8900
New Holland CR 10.90
John Deere S790
John Deere X9 1100
Case IH 8250
It seems no. I dont know the exact reason, but I suspect Fendt dealer dont have Ideal 10 to demo around here. The combine market in Estonia is quite small and Fendt and CaseIH sell very few combines here.No Fendt 10?
Conditions are good in a sense that the potential for big yields is there and usually the limiting factor is rain. If we get more rain, then some farmers can get wheat yields that are 10+ tonnes per hectare. Harvesting conditions are usually good, but I have seen some years where its constantly raining and have to harvest over 25% moisture content crops.How are conditions there, what are your crops and historical yields?
They better bring plenty of spares for that CR 10.90, ones here in big crops keep breaking. They just keep upping the power to go up a class and the guts cant handle it!In Estonia, 17-19 august there is going to be a combine test where they are going to compare pretty much all parameters of the top combines. It seems that all the dealers send their own people to the drivers seat.
They are going to compare throughput, losses, fuel consumption, broken grain %, sample quality, straw and chaff spreading quality. They are also going to do some financial analysis comparing the prices of combines and and how much its going to cost to maintain them (fuel and adblue cost, money lost through losses etc.). They are going to harvest rye and rapeseed. The testing is being done by ETKI(Eesti Taimekasvatuse Instituut) that has done similar tests before.
combines that are going to the test
Claas Lexion 8900
New Holland CR 10.90
John Deere S790
John Deere X9 1100
Case IH 8250
What can't handle it? We have been running them for years in some tough conditions with no issues at all.They better bring plenty of spares for that CR 10.90, ones here in big crops keep breaking. They just keep upping the power to go up a class and the guts cant handle it!
NDA?Why has'nt Don given this a 3 page comment like he always does when class and deere are talked about?This is not a jab is seems odd he has'nt commented,i see he has replied to different threads since this thread has been started.
Up until recently I was contracting to a corporate farmer with geographically widely spread properties with a 20 year old STS JD. One of the other regions had a contractor with a 1 yo 10.90. The overall manager would visit all the properties regularly so I always knew how everyone was going. I know my well prepared and maintained 20yo machine had more uptime than the 1 yo 10.90. I forget the specifics but I do remember him commenting that it was breaking parts when hooking into big crops, also had a lot of electrical problems. They ended up hiring a 9.90 to get the harvest finished.What can't handle it? We have been running them for years in some tough conditions with no issues at all.
So third hand vague info on one combine. Ok then, better trade ours off on smaller ones before they fly apart.Up until recently I was contracting to a corporate farmer with geographically widely spread properties with a 20 year old STS JD. One of the other regions had a contractor with a 1 yo 10.90. The overall manager would visit all the properties regularly so I always knew how everyone was going. I know my well prepared and maintained 20yo machine had more uptime than the 1 yo 10.90. I forget the specifics but I do remember him commenting that it was breaking parts when hooking into big crops, also had a lot of electrical problems. They ended up hiring a 9.90 to get the harvest finished.
Comparing a 20yr old STS to a 10.90 is like comparing a Kia car to a Truck when pulling a camper.Up until recently I was contracting to a corporate farmer with geographically widely spread properties with a 20 year old STS JD. One of the other regions had a contractor with a 1 yo 10.90. The overall manager would visit all the properties regularly so I always knew how everyone was going. I know my well prepared and maintained 20yo machine had more uptime than the 1 yo 10.90. I forget the specifics but I do remember him commenting that it was breaking parts when hooking into big crops, also had a lot of electrical problems. They ended up hiring a 9.90 to get the harvest finished.
Living up to your moniker a bit there mate, I wasnt comparing them performance wise. Only reliability. You can have the biggest capicity machine on the planet but it will harvest zero tph while its sitting in the corner of the paddock broken!Comparing a 20yr old STS to a 10.90 is like comparing a Kia car to a Truck when pulling a camper.
No first hand info from the disgusted property manager seeing a million dollar machine continually failing while his crops are smashed by the weather!So third hand vague info on one combine. Ok then, better trade ours off on smaller ones before they fly apart.