On my farm I can only justify the plane if I am making just one pass through the field (post herbicide incrop). If I think I'll be doing 2 or more apps for fungi, insects, and preharvest glyphosate then I'll use the ground rig and follow the same tracks. Even though my tires are 380's, the tracks tend to get a little wider every time I make a subsequent operation. It also seems like by the time you've driven on those tracks multiple times the amount of regrowth (and therefore green kernels at harvest) gets reduced, but on only one pass there seems to be quite a bit more green in the tracks come harvest. As for coverage/effectiveness of either plane or SP, based on what I've seen on my farm with preharvest glyphosate, the plane did better at penetrating the canopy and getting the spray to ground level than my ground rig. However that is with a systemic product in tall cereals. With a contact product like Reglone (for desication on short, heavily canopied lentils) my ground rig does a better job than the plane. This year neither the plane nor ground rig did were overly effective with my fungicide application in heavy durum.
I think to get away from green kernels at harvest, what SWMan is doing with tramlines is ideal, but takes a lot of thought to wrap your head around to perfect it, at least for my small brain. I also think crop dividers would help out quite a bit to reduce green kernels. Big square fields would also benefit I think.
As for cost of application its easy to determine when you're paying a plane to do, but if you're doing it yourself or having it done with a ground rig one needs to factor in all the costs involved. If I'm doing it myself I peg $3/ac to operate my SP. Here is a link to the calculator I use to estimate what my wheel tracks cost me:
Ground vs Air
You should like the calculator Don, it's all in metric. Takes me awhile to do all the conversions to imperial but it gives a good idea of what your costs are given a few assumptions you make like crop yield and price.