The Combine Forum banner

Best brand of combine?

  • John Deere

    Votes: 246 32%
  • Case IH

    Votes: 197 26%
  • Gleaner

    Votes: 112 15%
  • Massy

    Votes: 58 7.6%
  • Lexion

    Votes: 82 11%
  • New Holland

    Votes: 55 7.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 11 1.4%

Best combine ever???

167K views 161 replies 104 participants last post by  dookiller  
#1 ·
Now that it seems we have a thread for the best and worst of everything. What's everyone's favorite combine? I guess I'd have to vote for the JD 9600 but what does everyone else think?

-Dano
 
#8 ·
i have to agree with some others our 9600 we used to have was probably the most reliable machine we ever owned had good capacity and just seemed to go and go. it kind of reminds me of the energizer bunny on tv it lasts and lasts. kind of wish we had it back some days when were working on the newer ones
 
#13 ·
Yah I would agree on the 9600s, with regular winter maintenance they would last entire season without breakage and if they did you can go to your dealership or combine wrecker and parts availability is never ending. Its a shame Deere doesn't try and make combines like that anymore, I guess its not good business for them to make a combine last for 10 years or more.
 
#18 ·
what about the predessesor to the 9600 the 7720 or 7721 . this combine found its way into alot of quonsets of different colors. the 9600 was just the blown up perfected version of these, or maybe the 6601 was the start...or the 4400...
 
#19 · (Edited)
I grew up on a Gleaner L. Like most on this forum I didn't have a lot of experience with much else. Having used both I would say a Gleaner R is a better wheat combine than a 9600. Don't know to much about other crops. However, there are a lot of 9600's around that are still chugging along just fine and they seem very reliable.

I think that this thread should be titled best combines of their time. Because its hard to compare them when they are from a different time period. For instance in my opinion. The Gleaner L and L2 were the best of their time. When the 9600 came out it was the best of its time. I think a 2 series Gleaner became a better combine.... but just like everyone else around here, I have a bias.... Everyone will go with what they know...

Here is my list.... I do not know much about New Holland or Massey Ferguson so please forgive me. I am just going off our area.

Massey Harris 21-A
Gleaner A, C2, G
John Deere 95
Gleaner L,M
Case IH 1680
John Deere 9600
Gleaner R72

And I think its to early to tell on Deere 9870, Case IH 9120 and New Holland Equivilent, Gleaner S77, Massey/Gleaner/Challenger Axial.
 
#24 ·
Have to say the original 1480 axial flow for the revolution they caused; then the cts for marrying the two concepts of conventional thresh and rotary separation to harness the benefits of both. In our area the early 480cat claas machines were the first to significantly increase capacity in all crops.
 
#25 ·
Would Have to say... been in farming whole life and my dad has had a Late model Gleaner L over 20 years.. with regular keep up ( grease, belts, oil,etc) it fires up every year and will keep up with some new combines.. yes it outdated to todays standards and were looking at upgrading to R series but shes ready every season no matter what... think we have about 4800 hrs on it and going strong
 
#26 ·
My father-in-law had a JD 7700 that he bought new in ???. That machine just kept going and going. It did wheat, beans and corn for years. Finally, when he was 75 and felt he wasn't able to keep it running he sold it to a salvage yard. It had 6800 hrs. on it and it really bothered him as he watched it being hauled down the road. He said it felt like he had lost a friend. I'm sure many of you can relate to that.
 
#29 ·
The 2388, lots of updates that made a great machine greater. They are very reliable and extremely simple to work on when you do have to. You also still see them on the custom run. The AFX rotor made a real beast out of them and got rid of the "solar powered combine" montra. Hour for hour the bring as much as a 9600 or 9610, but offer higher capacity in many crops.